Apologetics has NOT Left the Building
Interesting thoughts about the theological field of apologetics (explaining & defending the faith) from Dan Kimball of Vintage Faith, in an entry entitled "Re-inventing Jesus. Here's a few excerpts:
(guest speaker) "Dr. Sawyer primarily focused on the canonicty of the New Testament (a word which he explained). We set it up where I asked some questions and he would dialog and teach about it. It kind of felt like a church history class. He covered how the New Testament was compiled, addressed the various Gnostic gospels and how to look at them etc. We then had a time of open Q and A about anything about the formation of the Bible...""Creating a culture where discussing and learning theology will be a norm..." Wow. I like the sound of that. I hope Dan keeps blogging about how that part of their journey plays out.
"Here's what I witnessed. That going into theology at this level and going into "reasons" of why Christians believe what they do - is very much needed and not only needed, but seeing the response of people at our church, very much desired."
"As a church, we have a general vision sort of a statement that says: We are asking God to transform us into a ... worshiping - community - of- missional - theologians". We put the word theologian in there, as we want to create a culture in our church where discussing and learning theology will become a norm for us. We have a long way to go on this, but I hope we continue to think and pray how to make this a reality."




3 Comments:
That's very interesting, Rob.
I'm just starting a course in christology, and I'm already finding that much of my picture of Christ, and his continuing work is more defined by screwy church tradition, rather that Bible. To infuse a core of strong theology into your church philosophy makes a lot of sense...
Hi, nice blog! I am not so sure about your position as far as the emergent/missional thing goes. We do sometimes need to have conversations that are a bit 'close to the edge' in order to figure out definitely where that edge really is. I do agree that this is not for all, but, as I got here from following a link from OST, engaging in broader conversations on theology, church, gospel and mission are all important and will help to make something better out of the emerging church than otherwise - if we can keep in loving fellowship despite and perhaps because of our differences...
Sam,
Two things:
(1) What's "OST"? I've seen you refer to it on a couple of other blog, and I'm not familiar with it.
(2) Please feel free to read some of the linked articles in my sidebar. I think you'll find that I'm in favour of a broad range of reading, discussion, etc.
As an aside, WOW have I ever been surprised at how much furor can erupt because someone (me) simply says, "I'm more comfortable with this than with that".
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home